Services that move the decision forward.
Six focused offerings—from requirements to implementation readiness.
How we work
- Stakeholders disagree on priorities
- Board date within 60–90 days
- IT asks for specifics before engaging
- Cross-functional workshops with finance, IT, and ops
- Detailed requirements document by process area
- Must-have vs nice-to-have prioritization matrix
- Avoids vendor-driven scope creep
- Gives you a vendor-ready blueprint
- Ensures leadership alignment from day one
- Too many vendors to evaluate
- Conflicting analyst opinions
- You want roadmaps without the hype
- Market map of top vendors with positioning
- One-page vendor profiles with pros & cons
- Roadmap insights on upcoming features
- Separates hype from reality
- Saves weeks of analyst deck reading
- Gives you smarter questions for vendor meetings
- Need to move quickly
- Limited bandwidth for demos
- Risk of internal fatigue from too many options
- Objective scoring against your requirements
- 2–3 vendor shortlist with rationale
- Comparison matrix for executive review
- Cuts wasted cycles on poor fits
- Keeps evaluation focused and defendable
- Positions you for faster board approval
- Demos drift into theater
- Hard to compare like-for-like
- Stakeholders talk past each other post-demo
- Tailored demo agendas and scripts
- Weighted scoring templates for team input
- Red-flag checklist for vendor behavior
- Ensures demos show real workflows
- Makes evaluations apples-to-apples
- Reveals capability gaps before contracts are signed
- Pricing unclear or moving
- Board wants numbers and risks
- Multiple vendors still in play
- 3–5 year TCO/ROI model with scenarios
- Negotiation playbook with benchmark data
- Executive-ready decision summary deck
- Prevents hidden costs and weak SLAs
- Arms you with leverage on asks
- Gives executives confidence to sign off
- Unclear partner quality or fit
- Concerns about scope creep
- No crisp phase-1 success metrics
- Partner shortlist and reference checks
- Project plan & scope sanity review
- Success metrics and governance structure
- Reduces go-live risk
- Holds partners accountable
- Sets clear criteria for phase-one success
Build your plan
Mini case — $900M manufacturer
FAQ
How is this different from analyst firms or SIs?
Can we start with just one service?
Will you attend vendor calls and challenge them live?
Analyst Reports & Briefings
Independent insights for CFOs evaluating EPM—what’s real, what’s noise, and how to move faster.
- 10–15 buyer signals we’re seeing now
- Demo traps to avoid this quarter
- 2–3 vendors to actually consider
Get new reports in your inbox
Short briefings, buyer signals, and practical checklists—no fluff.
Independent. Practical. Rogue.
After 15+ years in EPM and 1,000+ evaluations, I started CFO Shortlist to give CFOs and IT leaders what vendor theater and biased quadrants can’t: clear, defensible choices—fast.
Why CFO Shortlist
I’ve sat on the vendor side and watched buyers waste months on scripted demos, fluffy ROI slides, and generic scorecards. This practice exists to cut through that—align Finance & IT, run objective demos, and land a decision you can defend with your board.
Principles
- Independent. No vendor fees or kickbacks—ever.
- Practical. Real workflows over product theater.
- Fast. 2-week shortlists, crisp decisions.
How I work
“We went from a scattered RFP to a defendable shortlist and a clean board decision in weeks. The demo scoring exposed gaps we never would’ve caught.”
- 20-min intro: goals, constraints, timeline
- Objective shortlist in ~2 weeks (typical)
- 1,000+ evaluations • zero vendor kickbacks